Platform How It Works Use Cases Integrations FAQ
AI Intelligence Quotient · Benchmark Platform

Measure What Your
AI Actually Knows

Every vendor claims their model is the smartest. aiiq.ms turns that claim into something measurable — a clear, repeatable way to evaluate how AI systems reason, retrieve, and respond across the tasks that actually matter to you.

aiiq.ms — live eval runner
aiiq eval run--suite=financial-reasoning --models=gpt-4o,claude-3-5,gemini-pro
Running 120 tasks across 3 models…
gpt-4oaccuracy:91.2% cost/1k:$18.40 lat:1.2s
claude-3-5accuracy:94.7% cost/1k:$15.00 lat:0.9s
gemini-proaccuracy:78.3% cost/1k:$10.50 lat:2.1s
✓ Recommendation: claude-3-5 — best accuracy/cost ratio for your workload
Report saved → financial-reasoning-2026-06-04.aiiq
0%
Avg accuracy improvement after switching to the highest-scoring model
0x
Faster model selection vs. manual evaluation processes
0%
Average cost reduction when matching workload to the right model
0+
Benchmark task types across reasoning, retrieval, coding, and safety

Benchmark Real Capability — and Beyond

aiiq.ms replaces hype and guesswork with measurement. Four evaluation dimensions, one explainable score, continuous monitoring.

Task-Based Accuracy Scoring

Measure reasoning, coding, retrieval, summarization, and tool use against realistic prompts drawn from your actual workloads — not synthetic benchmarks designed to make every model look good.

Head-to-head comparison on identical inputs across all candidate models
Domain-specific test sets built from your own data and industry prompts
Every score is explainable and reproducible — holds up to scrutiny
See exactly where each model pulls ahead or falls short on your criteria
Accuracy Breakdown — Financial Reasoning Suite
gpt-4o
91%
claude-3-5
94.7%
gemini-pro
78.3%
mistral-l
82.0%
llama-3.1
76.0%
✓ Winner: claude-3-5 on your financial workload

Cost vs Quality Intelligence

See what each point of accuracy actually costs, so you spend deliberately. The most expensive model is almost never the right model for every task in your stack.

Cost-per-accuracy-point comparison across all evaluated models
Latency and reliability factored into the total score, not just correctness
Right-model-per-workload routing recommendations with projected savings
Defensible spend reports for finance and leadership review
Cost / Quality Matrix
Efficiency
claude
Raw Quality
claude
Cost/Task
gpt-4o
Latency
claude
Projected monthly savings: $14,200 → switching to recommended routing

Safety & Hallucination Checks

Flag confident-but-wrong answers and unsafe outputs before users see them. Safety scoring is built into every evaluation run, not bolted on as an afterthought.

Hallucination rate measured on factual verification tasks
Confidence calibration — does the model know when it doesn't know?
Unsafe output detection across jailbreak and adversarial prompt categories
Safety scores integrated into overall ranking, not reported separately
Safety Score Breakdown
Hallucination
96%
Calibration
89%
Adversarial
82%
Bias Score
91%
✓ Safe for production deployment on this task class

Regression Tracking & Monitoring

Watch how a model's performance shifts release to release and catch silent regressions before they become production incidents. Get warned the moment quality drops.

Automated re-scoring when a model provider pushes an update
Regression alerts via Slack, email, or webhook when thresholds are crossed
Historical performance charts for every model and version combination
Side-by-side diff of outputs before and after a regression event
Version Regression Alert
⚠ REGRESSION DETECTED
Model: gpt-4o · Updated: 2026-05-30
Task class: legal-summarization
Accuracy: 94.1% → 81.2% (↓12.9pp)
Hallucination rate: 2.1% → 8.7%
Recommendation: Roll back to gpt-4o-2026-04 or switch to claude-3-5 for this task class.

Evidence in Four Steps

From defining tasks to ranked, explainable recommendations and continuous monitoring — in minutes, not months.

1

Define Tasks & Criteria

Specify the tasks and quality criteria that matter for your use case. Use built-in suites or build from your own data and prompts.

2

Run Candidate Models

aiiq.ms runs every candidate model against a consistent, repeatable test set. Same inputs, same conditions, no cherry-picking.

3

Score Across Dimensions

Results scored across accuracy, cost, latency, and safety. Every metric is explainable and reproducible to hold up to scrutiny.

4

Monitor & Get Alerted

Ranked comparison delivered instantly. Ongoing monitoring continues as models change, with regression alerts the moment quality drops.

Intelligence That Drives Action

aiiq.ms doesn't just produce scores. It turns measurements into decisions your entire organization can act on and defend.

Right Model Per Workload

Match each task to the model that wins on your criteria — not the one with the best marketing. Route intelligently and stop overpaying for general capability when specialist models outperform.

Defensible Spend

Justify model choices to finance and leadership with hard numbers, not vendor slides. Every procurement decision becomes evidence-based and auditable from day one.

Regression Alarms

Get warned the moment a model's quality drops in production. Automated re-scoring on every provider update means silent regressions become visible alerts, not user-reported bugs.

Team-Wide AI Literacy

Give everyone — engineering, product, and leadership — a shared, grounded understanding of what your AI can and cannot do. Shared language, shared numbers, shared accountability.

Transparent Methodology

Every score is explainable and reproducible. Run the same evaluation again and get the same result. Results hold up to internal audit, procurement review, and board scrutiny.

Governance & Compliance

Build a defensible AI governance program backed by measurement. Demonstrate to regulators and auditors that model selection and quality assurance follow a documented, repeatable process.

Built for Every Stage of the AI Decision

🔍 Pre-Deployment

Model Selection Before Commitment

Before signing a contract or committing to a provider, run every candidate model against your actual workloads. Arrive at vendor negotiations with evidence — not assumptions. Replace the gut-feel selection process with ranked, explainable scores that hold up to scrutiny at every level of your organization.

📊 Production

Ongoing Quality Assurance

AI features already in production need continuous monitoring, not a one-time evaluation. aiiq.ms re-scores automatically when providers update their models, so you catch quality regressions before users do. Build quality gates that automatically alert the team when scores drop below acceptable thresholds.

📋 Procurement

Vendor Reviews & Objective Evidence

Procurement and vendor reviews that need objective, auditable evidence. Replace vendor-supplied benchmarks with independently generated scores on your own task sets. Provide finance and legal with the defensible documentation they need to approve AI spend at scale.

🎓 Governance

Internal AI Literacy & Governance

As AI spreads through an organization, leaders need a defensible answer to "why this model, and how do we know it's good enough?" aiiq.ms produces that answer in numbers, building team-wide AI literacy and supporting formal AI governance programs that satisfy board and regulatory expectations.

Every Major Model. One Platform.

aiiq.ms evaluates models from every major provider — commercial frontier models, open-source, and custom fine-tuned endpoints. One consistent benchmark, all your options, side by side.

OpenAI
Frontier
Anthropic
Frontier
Google AI
Frontier
Mistral
Frontier
Cohere
Enterprise
Together AI
Inference
Groq
Inference
Replicate
Open-Source
Ollama
Self-Hosted
Custom API
Any Endpoint

Plus any OpenAI-compatible endpoint. New providers added continuously.

Enterprise-Grade Security From Day One

aiiq.ms handles evaluation data with the same rigor you expect from mission-critical infrastructure. Evaluation prompts and outputs stay in your control — always.

🔒
SOC 2 Type II
Annual audit
🇪🇺
GDPR
EU data residency
🏗️
Self-Hosted
Full isolation
🔑
CMEK
Bring your key
🌐
Data Residency
EU & US regions
📋
HIPAA Ready
Healthcare configs
Feature Starter Team Enterprise
Task-based scoring
Domain-specific test sets
Regression monitoring
Safety & hallucination checks
SOC 2 / GDPR reports
Self-hosted deployment
Custom model endpoints

Evidence-Based Trust

We were about to sign a $200k/year contract with a frontier model provider. aiiq.ms showed us that for 80% of our tasks, a model at a third of the cost scored higher on our actual data. We renegotiated and saved $140k in the first year alone.

VP
VP of Engineering
Series C Fintech Platform

A silent update to our model provider degraded our legal summarization accuracy from 94% to 81% overnight. Without aiiq.ms, we would have found out from our clients. Instead we caught it in under 6 hours and had a fix in production the same day.

CTO
CTO
Legal Tech SaaS, 2,000 firms

Our board was asking hard questions about AI governance. We needed to show we had a rigorous, auditable process for model selection — not just "we tried it and it seemed good." aiiq.ms gave us the evidence layer our governance program was missing.

CAI
Chief AI Officer
Enterprise Insurance Group

Questions Teams Ask Before Starting

Public leaderboards use generic, standardized tasks designed to compare models in the abstract. aiiq.ms evaluates models against your specific tasks, prompts, and quality criteria — so scores reflect performance in your context, not a synthetic average. A model that ranks first on a public leaderboard may rank third on your actual workload, and vice versa.
Yes. Domain-specific test sets are a core feature of aiiq.ms. You can build evaluations from your own data, prompts, and expected outputs — or use curated industry suites as a starting point. Your test sets are private to your workspace and never used to train or benchmark other customers' evaluations.
All major commercial providers — OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Mistral, Cohere — plus open-source models via Together, Groq, Replicate, Ollama, and any OpenAI-compatible endpoint. You can also evaluate custom fine-tuned models hosted on your own infrastructure. New providers are added based on customer demand.
aiiq.ms automatically re-runs your evaluation suite when a model provider publishes an update. If scores drop below your configured thresholds, you receive an alert via Slack, email, or webhook within hours — not days. Every regression event includes a side-by-side diff of outputs and a recommended action.
Yes. Your prompts, outputs, and test sets are private to your workspace and fully encrypted at rest and in transit. We support customer-managed encryption keys (CMEK), EU and US data residency, and self-hosted deployment for teams that cannot send data to external services. SOC 2 Type II audited annually.
Most teams run their first benchmark within an hour of signing up — using built-in task suites that cover reasoning, coding, retrieval, and summarization. Building domain-specific test sets from your own data takes a day or two. Full production monitoring is typically live within a week.
Start Measuring Today

Stop Guessing.
Score Your AI.

AI decisions are now business decisions, and business decisions need evidence. aiiq.ms replaces hype and guesswork with measurement, so your AI investments are grounded in what the technology actually delivers.